Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Mercy-killings qualify as allowings when the equipment co... — Carmelics
    Home/Consequentialism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Mercy-killings (euthanasia) are outside of deontological obligations and thus eligible for justification by good consequences

    Mercy-killings qualify as allowings when the equipment could justifiably have been allocated to another patient had the doctors known at the time of connection what they know at the time of disconnection

    Consequentialism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Consequentialism

    Key Terms

    Allowings(as used in ethics and philosophy of action)
    Actions where you let something happen by removing your help or protection, rather than actively doing something to cause it—like stepping back instead of stepping in.
    Counterfactual knowledge(as used in this statement comparing what doctors knew at different times)
    Knowledge about what *would have* happened in a different situation (like what doctors would have done if they'd known different information earlier).
    Doctrine of Double Effect(Proposed as one explanation for differing moral judgments in trolley-type cases)
    A moral principle that distinguishes between harm that is strictly intended (as a means or end) and harm that is merely foreseen as a side effect of an action

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consequentialism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Justifiably(as used in moral reasoning)
    Done for reasons that are good enough or valid enough to be considered morally acceptable or reasonable.
    Mercy-killing(as used in ethics)
    Ending someone's life intentionally to relieve them from severe suffering, usually when they're terminally ill or in unbearable pain.

    Related

    An allowing occurs only when such removal returns the victim to some morally app...An allowing occurs when one's action merely removes a defense the victim otherwi...Mercy-killings (euthanasia) are outside of deontological obligations and thus el...Mercy-killings qualify as allowings when the agent removes only a defense agains...

    Similar

    Mercy-killings qualify as allowings when the agent removes only a defe...91%An allowing occurs when one's action merely removes a defense the vict...79%Mercy-killings (euthanasia) are outside of deontological obligations a...74%Another possible error is that individuals die from a condition becaus...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: ethics-deontological
    View source passageHide passage
    Second, causings are distinguished from allowings. In a narrow sense of the word we will here stipulate, one allows a death to occur when: (1) one’s action merely removes a defense the victim otherwise would have had against death; and (2) such removal returns the victim to some morally appropriate baseline (Kamm 1994, 1996; MacMahan 2003). Thus, mercy-killings, or euthanasia, are outside of our deontological obligations (and thus eligible for justification by good consequences) so long as one’s

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective