Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Merely possible individuals lack any identity conditions that would distinguish one from another, making quantification over them incoherent.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Abstract objects like numbers lack spatiotemporal properties yet have determinate identity conditions; so physicality isn't necessary for individuation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Possible individuals can be individuated by their essential properties and role in possible worlds, not by actual physical differences.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If quantification over merely possibles were incoherent, modal discourse itself (e.g., 'there could be different people') would be meaningless—but it seems perfectly coherent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Identity requires qualitative and spatiotemporal differences; merely possible individuals lack actual spatiotemporal location.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Without identity conditions, we cannot distinguish 'there exist two possible individuals' from 'there exists one,' making quantification meaningless.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Actual individuals are individuated by causal histories and physical properties; merely possible ones possess neither, leaving no principled individuation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.