Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Middle Knowledge uniquely grounds God's foreknowledge in counterfactuals of creaturely freedom, which are logically prior to God's creative decree.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
The logical priority of counterfactuals to God's decree is obscure: it's unclear how abstract propositions about conditionals exist independently of God.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Middle Knowledge faces the grounding problem: what makes counterfactuals of creaturely freedom true if not God's knowledge or the actual world's facts?
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Simpler alternatives exist: either God's timelessness dissolves the foreknowledge problem, or divine omniscience doesn't require prior truth-makers at all.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Counterfactuals of creaturely freedom are logically independent of God's decree, making them suitable truth-makers for God's foreknowledge.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Middle Knowledge preserves genuine libertarian free will by grounding foreknowledge in what creatures would freely choose, not what God commands.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Without counterfactuals of freedom as prior truth-bearers, God's foreknowledge of free acts seems to require either determinism or logical contradiction.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.