Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Mill argued in 'On Liberty' that paternalistic deference to wise authorities atrophies the individual's rational and moral faculties over time.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Accepting expert guidance in some domains (medicine, engineering) doesn't prevent reasoning development in others where autonomy remains.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Some individuals lack sufficient knowledge to reason well on complex issues; deference to expertise may better serve their interests than flawed self-determination.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Atrophy claim assumes linear relationship unproven empirically; people may develop moral faculties through non-autonomous channels like education and reflection.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Cognitive skills require practice; unused faculties atrophy like unused muscles, suggesting deference prevents moral reasoning development.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Historical evidence shows societies with paternalistic governance often exhibit lower civic engagement and critical thinking in subsequent generations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Psychological autonomy research indicates individuals making their own decisions report greater sense of agency and moral confidence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.