Mill's explicit formulations in On Liberty consistently frame the harm principle as restricting interference to prevent one person from harming others, not from failing to aid them.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
An idea that the only good reason to limit someone's freedom is to prevent harm to others—not to protect people from harming themselves or from doing things society disapproves of.