Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Mill's objection is not to moralistic or paternalistic le... — Carmelics
    Home/Rights & Liberty
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Moralistic or paternalistic legislation is permissible when it can also be defended by the harm principle.

    Mill's objection is not to moralistic or paternalistic legislation per se, but to restrictions that can only be justified in those ways.

    ConsequentialismRights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Rights & LibertyConsequentialism

    Connections

    1 topic

    Justice & Punishment1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Rights & Liberty
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A given regulation may fall under more than one category simultaneously.Moralistic or paternalistic legislation is permissible when it can also be defen...Prohibitions on murder and assault can be justified both as enforcing moral prov...

    Similar

    Some restrictions cannot be justified by appeal to harm prevention, on...87%Consequentialist arguments provide no principled objection to successf...82%Moralistic or paternalistic legislation is permissible when it can als...81%An exception to the usual prohibition on paternalism can be motivated ...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: mill-moral-political
    View source passageHide passage
    These distinctions allow Mill to defend a categorical approach to liberal rights. To decide whether an individual’s liberty ought to be protected, we must ascertain to which category the potential restriction of liberty belongs: offense, moralism, paternalism, and harm prevention. Mill seems to permit or forbid restrictions on liberty by category, claiming that the only restrictions that are permissible involve harm prevention. Of course, a given regulation might fall under more than one categor

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective