Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Mill's rejection of strong sufficiency compromises his on... — Carmelics
    Home/Rights & Liberty
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Mill's rejection of strong sufficiency compromises his one very simple principle (the harm principle).

    Rights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Strong sufficiency is what shows the harm principle is a complete guide to the regulation of liberty, specifying both when regulation is impermissible and when it is required.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Mill rejects strong sufficiency.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Without strong sufficiency, the harm principle cannot serve as a complete guide to the regulation of liberty.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Rights & LibertySocial Contract

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Mill rejects strong sufficiency.Strong sufficiency is what shows the harm principle is a complete guide to the r...Without strong sufficiency, the harm principle cannot serve as a complete guide ...

    Similar

    Without strong sufficiency, the harm principle must be supplemented wi...90%Mill has doubts about strong sufficiency of the harm principle.90%Without strong sufficiency, the harm principle cannot serve as a compl...84%Mill's harm principle must rely on the broader harm-prevention rationa...83%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: mill-moral-political
    View source passageHide passage
    But notice that if Mill rejects strong sufficiency then this compromises his one very simple principle. For only strong sufficiency shows that the harm principle is a complete guide to the regulation of liberty, telling us both when regulation is impermissible and when it is required. Even weak sufficiency implies that the harm principle must be supplemented with some other principle, such as the utilitarian principle, in order to determine if regulation is permissible, much less required. Mill’
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit