Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Mind alone is beautiful — Carmelics
    Home/Aesthetics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Mind alone is beautiful

    Aesthetics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    0 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.External objects achieve beauty only by having mind imprinted on them
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The source of beauty in any object is mind
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Aesthetics

    Related

    External objects achieve beauty only by having mind imprinted on themThe source of beauty in any object is mind

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Aesthetics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The human being alone is capable of an ideal of beauty.83%Fire is the most beautiful physical thing.71%Nothing devoid of parts can be beautiful70%Hutcheson cannot infer that mind alone is beautiful from the premise t...68%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: aesthetics-18th-british
    View source passageHide passage
    It is in arguing for the internality of the power of discerning beauty that Hutcheson’s departure from Shaftesbury begins to show. Shaftesbury, it will be recalled, argues that the discernment of beauty is internal (or mental) on the grounds that the objects of beauty necessarily are: mind alone can discern beauty because mind alone is beautiful, external objects managing a degree of beauty only by having a bit of mind imprinted on them. But Hutcheson cannot make this argument because he does no
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (1 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit