Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Mixing something owned with something unowned is not sufficient to ground a claim of appropriation over the unowned thing

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.If mixing owned labor with unowned things generated ownership, then mixing any owned thing with an unowned thing should generate ownership
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Pouring owned tomato juice into the unowned ocean does not give the pourer ownership of the ocean
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Instead, the owned thing (tomato juice) is lost rather than the unowned thing (ocean) being gained
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Rights & Liberty
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.