Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Monroe Beardsley himself revised his account across editi... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Beardsley's account of aesthetic experience is inadequate.

    Monroe Beardsley himself revised his account across editions, conceding instability in the criteria, which undermines any claim that unity, intensity, and complexity form a robust theoretical foundation.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Across editions(explaining that Beardsley made changes over time as he published new versions)
    Over multiple published versions of his work, such as different printings or updates of a book.
    Instability in the criteria(the problem Beardsley admitted about his own theory)
    The standards or rules he used to judge something kept changing or weren't consistent, making them unreliable.
    Monroe Beardsley(his theory about literary meaning is being discussed here)
    An American philosopher who studied aesthetics (the philosophy of art and beauty) and how literary meaning works.
    Revised his account(describing how Beardsley modified his original ideas)
    Changed or updated his earlier explanation or theory based on new thinking or criticism.
    Robust theoretical foundation

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    (describing what Beardsley's criteria failed to be)
    A strong, solid, and dependable basis for a theory that can withstand criticism and testing.
    Unity, intensity, and complexity(as the specific criteria Beardsley used in his aesthetic theory)
    Three qualities Beardsley proposed to judge whether something is a successful work of art: how well its parts fit together, how powerful its impact is, and how intricate or layered it is.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Aesthetics1 linked

    Related

    Beardsley's account of aesthetic experience is inadequate.

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective