Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Moral conclusions are connected to the principles of the ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Bioethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Moral conclusions in Beauchamp and Childress's approach are justified through both coherence and foundationalism

    Moral conclusions are connected to the principles of the common morality, which serves as the foundationalist aspect of the account

    BioethicsTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    BioethicsTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    Moral conclusions are also justified through coherence via the method of wide re...Moral conclusions in Beauchamp and Childress's approach are justified through bo...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Bioethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A conclusion implies moral knowledge if it provides the best explanati...77%Moral conclusions in Beauchamp and Childress's approach are justified ...76%Modern moral theory holds that there is a fact-value distinction that ...75%A satisfactory account of morality must explain both its objective aut...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: theory-bioethics
    View source passageHide passage
    Importantly, this common morality is historicist, in that its authority is established historically, through the success of its related norms in advancing human flourishing across time and place. However, unlike many historicist accounts, the common morality is not relativist, as its norms are to be applied universally. Beauchamp and Childress accord the common morality a special place within their approach, a place shielded from the jostling involved in the quest for coherence through wide refl

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective