Moral constraints (e.g., don't kill innocents) derive their justification from protecting human welfare; catastrophic outcomes that dwarf ordinary harms override this justification.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
The condition on a knower's belief that excludes mere luck — the belief must be held in a way that is appropriate or warranted, not merely accidentally correct.
moral constraints(ethics)
Limits or rules set by morality that we cannot cross, even if breaking them would help us achieve our goals (like rules against killing innocent people).