Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Moral judgment must fundamentally consist of sentiments
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Hume's own is-ought gap implies sentiments are contingent psychological states that cannot ground normative authority.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A moral judgment carries genuine prescriptive force only if grounded in something more than variable affective responses.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If sentiments merely describe what agents feel rather than what they ought to do, sentiment-based accounts conflate moral psychology with moral epistemology.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Kant demonstrated that pure practical reason generates the categorical imperative independently of inclination or sentiment.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If reason alone can bind the will through recognition of universal law, sentiment is not necessary for moral motivation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Moral judgment of its very nature motivates action
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Reason does not motivate action; only sentiments motivate action
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.