Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Moral normativity cannot extend beyond what is in the fundamental interest of agents.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Hutcheson's moral sense theory grounds normativity in benevolent affections that are structurally other-directed, not self-interested.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If benevolence is a genuine motivational faculty, then moral normativity can extend to others' welfare independently of agent self-interest.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Kant argues that moral normativity derives from rational autonomy and the categorical imperative, which binds agents regardless of their contingent interests.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A principle binding all rational agents categorically cannot be reducible to what serves any particular agent's fundamental interests.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Moral normativity has an essential connection to the motivations of agents.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The motivations of agents are fundamentally self-directed.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.