Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Moral responsibility, as P.F. Strawson argues in 'Freedom... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The state's response to crimes should focus on rehabilitation rather than retribution, treating offenders as morally responsible agents but not blaming them.

    Moral responsibility, as P.F. Strawson argues in 'Freedom and Resentment', is constitutively linked to reactive attitudes like blame and resentment.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Moral responsibility is a social practice, not a metaphysical fact. It exists only within our system of reactive attitudes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Blame and resentment are the natural human responses that constitute holding someone responsible in everyday life.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Attempts to ground responsibility in abstract metaphysics (free will, desert) fail; the reactive attitude framework explains what we actually do.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Reactive attitudes can be inappropriate or unjust even if genuinely felt. Circularity: we need independent grounds to evaluate them.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.People can deserve blame even when no one actually blames them. Responsibility seems to exist independent of anyone's attitudes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The account conflates the *practice* of holding responsible with the *conditions* that make responsibility justified or appropriate.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Justice & Punishment1 linked

    Related

    Attempts to ground responsibility in abstract metaphysics (free will, desert) fa...Blame and resentment are the natural human responses that constitute holding som...Moral responsibility is a social practice, not a metaphysical fact. It exists on...People can deserve blame even when no one actually blames them. Responsibility s...
    +3 moreShow less
    Reactive attitudes can be inappropriate or unjust even if genuinely felt. Circul...The account conflates the *practice* of holding responsible with the *conditions...The state's response to crimes should focus on rehabilitation rather than retrib...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit