Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Motion without any medium — that is, through a void — is possible
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Motion requires a medium to determine direction and differentiate positions, as Aristotle argues in Physics IV: void is dimensionally undifferentiated.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Without qualitative differentiation of positions, a body in void has no reason to move in one direction rather than another, making determinate motion impossible.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Celestial spheres move through a plenum of aether, a fifth element posited precisely to serve as their medium, not through genuine void.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Ibn Bājja's inference from celestial motion to void-motion possibility commits the fallacy of equivocation: 'no resistant medium' is not equivalent to 'no medium whatsoever'.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
The celestial spheres move without passing through any resistant medium
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.