Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Motion's being successive derives from time, and Motion's... — Carmelics
    Home/Causation
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Space and time are unified as merely distinguishable aspects of Motion.

    Motion's being successive derives from time, and Motion's having distinguishable elements derives from space.

    Causation
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Causation

    Connections

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility4 linked

    Related

    Motion is both successive and has distinguishable elements.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Causation
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Space abstracted from time becomes a mere 'blank', without distinguishable eleme...
    Space and time are unified as merely distinguishable aspects of Motion.
    Time abstracted from space becomes a mere 'now', incapable of succession.
    +1 moreShow less
    When abstracted from each other, space and time could not exist independently.

    Similar

    Motion is both successive and has distinguishable elements.87%Space and time are unified as merely distinguishable aspects of Motion...82%When abstracted from each other, space and time could not exist indepe...75%If space and time interact with body, space and time are relative.74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: alexander
    View source passageHide passage
    Alexander presents a metaphysical argument for the unity of space and time, arguing they are merely distinguishable aspects of Motion. He argues that space and time must be unified because, when abstracted away from each other, it becomes clear that they could not exist independently. Time would become a mere “now”, incapable of succession; and space would become a mere “blank”, without distinguishable elements (Alexander 1920i: 47). Motion is both successive and boasts distinguishable elements

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective