Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Moving parts within an extended universe are impossible
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Aristotle's distinction between potential and actual infinity dissolves Zeno's paradoxes without denying motion.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A supertask traversing infinite divisions is completable if the series converges to a finite sum, as in Cauchy's formalization.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Therefore Zeno's paradox shows only that naive infinity concepts are confused, not that motion itself is impossible.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Newton's and Leibniz's calculus provides a rigorous mathematical framework in which instantaneous velocity and continuous motion are coherently defined.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Empirical science routinely describes and predicts motion with precision, providing strong defeasible evidence that motion is actual rather than impossible.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
Zeno's paradox demonstrates the impossibility of motion in an extended universe
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.