Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Much of what speakers mean and successfully communicate d... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The argument against word meaning does not succeed in establishing that only speaker meaning exists.

    Much of what speakers mean and successfully communicate depends on word meaning existing.

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked

    Related

    Speakers could not use phrases like 'children under 11 may enter free' to convey...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The argument against word meaning does not succeed in establishing that only spe...
    The argument denies the existence of word meaning, claiming only speaker meaning...
    The argument's own reasoning does not support the denial of word meaning.

    Similar

    Sentence meaning and speaker meaning are distinct and can diverge.86%Sentence meaning and speaker meaning do not always coincide.85%The speaker's meaning (what the speaker intends) and the sentence's me...83%Expression meaning is explained in terms of speaker meaning.82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: legal-interpretation
    View source passageHide passage
    The argument runs roughshod over the distinction between word meaning and speaker meaning. The proponents of the argument deny the existence of word meaning, claiming, in effect, that the only meaning is speaker meaning. But their argument does not support the denial, and much of what speakers mean (and successfully communicate) would not be possible if it were not for word meaning.[21] You could not use the words, “children under 11 may enter free” to mean that children 11 and over must pay for

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective