Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Museums display such objects for reasons other than those... — Carmelics
    Home/Aesthetics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The appearance of coatracks, old shoes, broken sticks, and similar objects in museums does not show that 'art' in the primary sense is wrongly defined in terms of artifactuality and aesthetic intention.

    Museums display such objects for reasons other than those objects being art in the primary sense.

    Aesthetics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Aesthetics

    Connections

    1 topic

    Philosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    A perfectly good explanation of such phenomena can be provided in accord with a ...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Aesthetics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The appearance of coatracks, old shoes, broken sticks, and similar objects in mu...
    The fact that critics and historians call such objects 'works of art' may reflec...

    Similar

    Fine arts museums display objects for reasons other than their status ...87%The display of an object in a fine arts museum does not constitute str...81%Beautiful objects manifest artistry in their production79%Duchamp's Fountain may be displayed in a museum not because it is a wo...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: beardsley-aesthetics
    View source passageHide passage
    Beardsley never explicitly responded to this objection, but he wouldn’t be fazed. The objection assumes that if an object is displayed in a museum—a fine arts museum, not a history museum or any other sort of museum—or if an art historian or art critic discusses an object, then it must be a work of art, or at least that there’s very strong reason to think that it’s a work of art. That it’s some reason to think so Beardsley wouldn’t deny; but that it’s necessarily a strong or definitive reason he

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective