Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Mutually inconsistent properties cannot both belong to a ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The inconsistent cognitive traits of video game characters cannot be traits of the hardware system that realizes those characters.

    Mutually inconsistent properties cannot both belong to a single system.

    Consciousness & MindModality & Possibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityConsciousness & Mind

    Connections

    1 topic

    Personal Identity2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A video game may include one character with one set of cognitive abilities (e.g....The inconsistent cognitive traits of video game characters cannot be traits of t...These two sets of cognitive traits are mutually inconsistent.

    Similar

    If two systems differ in a fundamental property, they cannot be the sa...85%An inconsistent bundle of properties cannot constitute a coherently ex...81%Postulating that the properties a subsystem has as a separated system ...80%A consistent system cannot construct paradoxes within itself.80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: chinese-room
    View source passageHide passage
    Cole (1991) offers an additional argument that the mind doing the understanding is neither the mind of the room operator nor the system consisting of the operator and the program: running a suitably structured computer program might produce answers submitted in Chinese and also answers to questions submitted in Korean. Yet the Chinese answers might apparently display completely different knowledge and memories, beliefs and desires than the answers to the Korean questions – along with a denial th

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective