Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    □N is invalid in KQML's semantics — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→□N is unprovable in KQML

    □N is invalid in KQML's semantics

    Truth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    KQML is sound relative to Kripke's semantics for closed formulasSoundness guarantees that no invalid formula is provable in a sound deductive sy...□N is unprovable in KQML

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    CBF is invalid in KQML's semantics100%BF is invalid in KQML's semantics100%The Converse Barcan Formula (CBF) is invalid in KQML91%Argument B* is invalid88%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: possibilism-actualism
    View source passageHide passage
    With these modifications in place, Kripke is able to demonstrate that his deductive system KQML is sound and complete for closed formulas relative to his semantics. Soundness, in particular, tells us that no invalid formula is provable in the system. Hence, since BF, CBF, and \(\Box\textbf{N}\) are all invalid in KQML, soundness guarantees that they are all unprovable in KQML.

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective