Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Napoleon's conquest of Europe was a world-historical event that advanced the rational bureaucratic state.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Tolstoy argued in War and Peace that great men are retrospective fictions imposed on diffuse, ungovernable historical forces.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If Napoleon's conquests resulted from aggregate social forces rather than singular agency, attributing rational state-building to him commits the great man fallacy.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A conclusion resting on a false attribution of historical causation cannot ground a defensible claim about world-historical progress.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Hegel's 'world-historical individual' advances Spirit unwittingly, making Napoleon an instrument rather than an agent of rational freedom.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
An instrument of historical forces cannot be credited as the author of the rational state he merely occasions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
World-historical events are those that bring about the final, full stage of history and human freedom.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Napoleon's conquests established the terms of the rational bureaucratic state across Europe.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42