Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Natural evil does not actually exist, because we lack the proper perspective to perceive the overall beauty of the natural system.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.We do not currently have the right perspective to see the overall beauty of the natural system.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.What appears to be natural evil is a failure of perspective, not a genuine feature of reality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Leibniz's theodicy holds that God perceives the universe as a maximally perfect whole, while finite minds perceive only fragmentary parts.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Apparent disharmony in a fragment does not constitute genuine disharmony in the whole system from which it is abstracted.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Therefore, what we call natural evil is an artifact of our perceptual and cognitive finitude, not an objective feature of the cosmos.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Aesthetic judgment requires the appropriate scale and frame: a dissonant chord evaluated in isolation differs from the same chord within a resolved symphony.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Marcus Aurelius and the Stoics argued that natural processes judged harmful from a partial view are necessary constituents of the rational cosmic order (logos).
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If the correct evaluative frame for natural processes is the whole system rather than isolated events, our ascription of 'evil' commits a category error of scope.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.