Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Natural language is full of innumerable equivocations. — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Natural language makes reasoning obscure and is difficult to use as a tool for precise inference.

    Natural language is full of innumerable equivocations.

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Connections

    2 topics

    Perception1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    Natural language is an imperfect mirror of intelligible thoughts.Natural language makes reasoning obscure and is difficult to use as a tool for p...

    Similar

    Human languages are among the things generated by that articulation.80%Natural language has a nuanced nature that is simultaneously physical,...76%Human language does not necessarily yield a potentially infinite array...76%Human languages are manifestations of cosmic articulation rather than ...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: leibniz-mind
    View source passageHide passage
    According to Leibniz, natural language, despite its powerful resources for communication, often makes reasoning obscure since it is an imperfect mirror of intelligible thoughts. As a result, it is often difficult to reason with the apparatus of natural language, “since it is full of innumerable equivocations” (On the Universal Science: Characteristic (undated); G VII, 205/S 18). Perhaps this is because of his view that the terms of natural language stand for complex, or derivative, concepts—conc

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective