Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Natural selection might equip humans with ultimate desire... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Psychological altruism does not entail biological altruism.

    Natural selection might equip humans with ultimate desires to foster the welfare of their offspring.

    Consciousness & MindMoral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityConsciousness & Mind

    Connections

    1 topic

    Virtue Ethics3 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    However, helping offspring typically increases the helper's own fitness, which m...Organisms with such ultimate desires would qualify as psychological altruists.Psychological altruism does not entail biological altruism.

    Similar

    The mechanism of natural selection is well-understood and can be appli...79%A selective mentality in reproduction may lead to conditional rather t...77%Unchosen luck of genetic inheritance and early socialization fixes an ...77%Freely choosing good over evil makes it possible for humans to develop...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: altruism-empirical
    View source passageHide passage
    But as Sober and Wilson (1998) have argued with great clarity, there is no simple connection between evolutionary theory and the philosophical debate between egoism and altruism. This is because the concept of altruism that is important in evolutionary theory is quite different from the standard concept of altruism invoked in the philosophical debate. For biologists, an organism behaves altruistically if and only if the behavior in question reduces its own fitness while increasing the fitness of

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective