Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Necessary desires should be satisfied.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Stoic askesis demonstrates that trained agents can reframe apparent necessities as indifferents through disciplined rational judgment.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If perceived necessity is itself subject to rational revision, the category of 'necessary desire' lacks a stable, desire-independent foundation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A desire whose necessity can be dissolved by philosophical practice does not generate an unconditional normative obligation to satisfy it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Kant's duty ethics holds that inclinations—including painful bodily urges—carry no intrinsic moral weight in determining obligatory action.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The relief of escalating pain from unsatisfied desire is a merely empirical benefit, incapable of grounding a categorical normative 'should'.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Grounding 'should' in the avoidance of pain commits the supporting argument to a consequentialist premise that eudaimonists cannot assume without circularity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Necessary desires bring relief from unavoidable pain.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Failing to satisfy a necessary desire (e.g., drinking when thirsty) results in escalating pain.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Escalating pain is contrary to the aim of the blessed life.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.