Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Necessity, properly construed (as in Leibniz's critique of Descartes), requires truth in all possible worlds including those where God wills differently.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.This view makes God's will subordinate to logical laws, contradicting divine aseity and absolute sovereignty.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If necessary truths exist independently of God, they become a co-eternal principle limiting God's creativity and freedom.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Descartes' position (God wills even logical truths) preserves God's absolute transcendence better than Leibniz's.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Logical truths (like 2+2=4) remain true regardless of divine will, suggesting necessity transcends God's power.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If God could make contradictions true, 'omnipotence' becomes meaningless; necessity constrains even infinite power.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Leibniz correctly distinguished between absolute necessity (metaphysical) and contingency (dependent on God's choice).
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.