Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Negation operates on the logical form of a predicate, not on its extension, so universality of extension does not block infinitatio.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If a predicate applies to everything (universal extension), negating its form yields a predicate with empty extension, which may be meaningless.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The distinction between form and extension cannot solve the semantic problem: iterated negations eventually lose rational interpretability regardless of logical structure.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Infinitatio poses a metaphysical problem about infinite regress, not merely a logical-formal one, so form/extension distinction alone cannot resolve it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Logical form and extension are distinct: a predicate's logical structure can be negated independently of what objects satisfy it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Infinitatio (infinite regress of negations) depends on formal-syntactic operations, not on whether predicates apply to everything or nothing.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Even universally true predicates can undergo logical negation at the form level, producing meaningful but extensionally empty results.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.