Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Negative retributivism treats desert as a side-constraint... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The line between negative retributivism and retributivism that posits a weak positive reason to punish may seem unimportant.

    Negative retributivism treats desert as a side-constraint, never as a reason to punish, while positive retributivism treats desert as a genuine pro tanto reason to punish.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Punishment inflicts suffering, so we need moral constraints preventing unjust punishment, not just reasons to pursue it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Desert as side-constraint aligns with rights-based frameworks: individuals have a right not to be punished without desert.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Positive retributivism risks justifying excessive punishment whenever desert is high, even when consequences don't warrant it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.If desert is only a constraint, it cannot explain why punishing the guilty is inherently valuable, distinct from merely permissible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Justice seems to demand that wrongdoers face proportional consequences, not merely that we may avoid punishing them.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Negative retributivism struggles to distinguish morally between unpunished desert and deserved-but-prevented punishment.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Justice & Punishment1 linked

    Related

    Desert as side-constraint aligns with rights-based frameworks: individuals have ...If desert is only a constraint, it cannot explain why punishing the guilty is in...Justice seems to demand that wrongdoers face proportional consequences, not mere...Negative retributivism struggles to distinguish morally between unpunished deser...
    +3 moreShow less
    Positive retributivism risks justifying excessive punishment whenever desert is ...Punishment inflicts suffering, so we need moral constraints preventing unjust pu...The line between negative retributivism and retributivism that posits a weak pos...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit