NFU's type-level distinctions between sets and their order types mean Omega is an ordinal only in a deflated, type-shifted sense, not the same ordinal concept it purports to extend.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
(as a mathematical structure being preserved or not)
A type of number used in mathematics to describe the order or position of things (like 1st, 2nd, 3rd), not just how many.
Sets(as mathematical/philosophical objects being discussed)
In mathematics and philosophy, a set is a collection of objects grouped together; for example, the set of all prime numbers or the set of all students in a classroom.
Type-level distinctions(how NFU organizes sets)
Differences between things based on what 'category' or 'level' they belong to; for example, treating individual numbers differently from collections of numbers.
Type-shifted(how Omega functions in NFU)
Changed or moved to a different category or level; here it means Omega's status as an ordinal changes depending on which logical level you're looking at.