Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Nietzsche argued that the assignment of a single 'proper business' to all mankind suppresses legitimate human diversity and hierarchical excellence.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Some shared purposes (justice, reciprocity, basic cooperation) are necessary for any functioning society, not optional suppressions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Celebrating 'hierarchical excellence' risks justifying exclusion and exploitation rather than protecting legitimate diversity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Individual excellence often requires social infrastructure and shared commitments that presuppose some common purposes among people.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Humans exhibit vastly different aptitudes, temperaments, and talents that single universal purposes necessarily fail to accommodate.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Forcing uniform roles prevents excellence by preventing individuals from pursuing pursuits where they could achieve mastery.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Historical progress has come from exceptional individuals pursuing unconventional paths, not from universal conformity to shared purposes.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.