Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Nishida's careful phrasing in 1945 was motivated by political self-protection
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Nishida's late writings consistently deploy careful, qualified phrasing as a deliberate philosophical method rooted in his logic of 'absolute contradictory self-identity'.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Attributing stylistic caution to political fear conflates his established rhetorical practice with situational opportunism.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Nishida's 1945 essay 'The Logic of Place and a Religious Worldview' advances substantive critiques of State Shinto's immanentism incompatible with mere self-protective hedging.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A philosopher seeking only political protection would omit, not subtly subvert, ideologically dangerous theological distinctions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Nishida was writing under a totalitarian government in 1945
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Expressing certain views could result in imprisonment on grounds of lèse majesté
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.