Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    No ancient source earlier than Diogenes Laertius (ca. 200... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Alcmaeon was not a Pythagorean

    No ancient source earlier than Diogenes Laertius (ca. 200 AD) calls Alcmaeon a Pythagorean

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    All sources support it3 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Philosophy of Language
    2 linked

    Related

    Alcmaeon was not a PythagoreanAristotle and Theophrastus refer to Alcmaeon multiple times but never identify h...Aristotle wrote a separate book on Alcmaeon distinct from his two books on the P...Aristotle's comparison of Alcmaeon to the Pythagoreans in Metaphysics I only mak...
    +2 moreShow less
    Most of the opposites crucial to Alcmaeon do not appear in the Pythagorean table...There is no trace of the crucial Pythagorean opposition between limit and unlimi...

    Similar

    No early sources identify Epicharmus as a Pythagorean75%A majority of ancient sources — including Clement, Galen, Aetius, Cens...73%No fifth- or fourth-century source identifies Epicharmus as a Pythagor...71%The earliest explicit identification of Epicharmus as a Pythagorean is...70%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: alcmaeon
    View source passageHide passage
    Diogenes Laertius, in his Lives of the Philosophers (3rd century AD), includes Alcmaeon among the Pythagoreans and says that he studied with Pythagoras (VIII. 83). Later authors such as Iamblichus (VP 104, 267), Philoponus (De An. p. 88), and the scholiast on Plato (Alc. 121e) also call Alcmaeon a Pythagorean. A majority of scholars up to the middle of the twentieth century followed this tradition. However, it is not true that the ancient “tradition is unanimous in presenting him as a Pythagorea

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective