Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    No cosmological arguments can provide examples of sound r... — Carmelics
    Home/Natural Theology
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    No cosmological arguments can provide examples of sound reasoning.

    Natural Theology
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • The conclusion of all versions of the cosmological argument invokes an impossibility.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Natural Theology

    Related

    The conclusion of all versions of the cosmological argument invokes an impossibi...

    Similar

    The cosmological argument is grounded in causal reasoning.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    87%
    The cosmological argument is defective.82%
    The deductive cosmological arguments have not committed some elementar...81%
    The respective premises of deductive cosmological arguments have the i...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted3/3 agreementValid
    SEP: cosmological-argument
    Richard Gale
    View source passageHide passage
    In the first part of the 20th century, with the rise of Positivism, the argument was largely abandoned. C. ” But since existence claims cannot be logically necessary, the statement is absurd. However, he notes, within us lies a deep-seated question: why should anything exist at all? Smart does not know what sort of question this is for it fails to fit his conception of propositions as either necessary truths or empirical claims. However, he continues, this awe-inspiring theological question appeals to those with a religious attitude. In this, the cosmological argument is reduced to a mystical ...
    Extraction notes

    Validity: The passage explicitly attributes to Richard Gale the Kantian-style argument that since the conclusion of all versions of the cosmological argument invokes an impossibility, no cosmological arguments can provide examples of sound reasoning.

    Confidence: Clearly attributed to Gale in Kantian fashion.

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit