No internal or causal constraint uniquely fixes which model is the intended one, so the claim that the sentence has a determinate truth-value presupposes a metaphysical realism that cannot be internally justified.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

causal constraint(Named 'the causal constraint' by Wright (1992: 71); central to Putnam's semantic externalism and his anti-skeptical argument.): The requirement that for an utterance of a word to represent or refer to a type of object, there must be some causal connection between uses of that word and the actual objects it purports to refer to.
determinate truth-value(in logic and metaphysics): A statement that is definitely either true or definitely false, with no ambiguity or middle ground.
intended(in philosophy of language): What someone actually meant or had in mind, as opposed to other possible meanings.
internal constraint(in logic and philosophy of language): A rule or limit that comes from within a system itself, rather than from outside it—like how the rules of chess are contained within the game.

Based on where you are in your exploration