Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    No one is ever responsible for anything. — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    No one is ever responsible for anything.

    Moral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.If the argument that a person is not responsible because they did not make themselves is accepted, then it applies universally.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.No human being has made themselves from scratch — all humans are products of heredity and environment.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Therefore the same excusing condition applies to every person for every action.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral Responsibility

    Connections

    1 topic

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Related

    If the argument that a person is not responsible because they did not make thems...No human being has made themselves from scratch — all humans are products of her...Therefore the same excusing condition applies to every person for every action.

    Similar

    No one is ever morally responsible.85%Therefore, no one is ever truly or ultimately morally responsible for ...82%Psychopaths may be held responsible, at least to some extent and in ce...82%Curious is substantively responsible for her burden and cannot hold ot...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: incompatibilism-arguments
    View source passageHide passage
    The defense attorney is trying to persuade the jurors that his client is not responsible for his action, but not for any of the standard excusing conditions—insanity, accident, mistaken belief, duress, mental handicap, and so on. Nor does he claim that there is anything that distinguishes his client from any of the rest of us. His argument is that his client is not responsible because he did not make himself. But none of us has made ourselves (at least not from scratch)—we are all the products o
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit