Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    No statement of psychological or psychophysical generaliz... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Strict lawlike relations between the mental and the physical are impossible.

    No statement of psychological or psychophysical generalizations could exhaust, and therefore explain, our conception of rationality.

    Consciousness & MindPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageConsciousness & Mind

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Causation
    2 linked

    Related

    If the concept of rationality cannot be captured in terms of the actual goings o...It is built into our conception of rationality that our own particular grasp of ...Strict lawlike relations between the mental and the physical are impossible.The concept of rationality does not simply consist in one's conception, at any g...

    Similar

    If the concept of rationality cannot be captured in terms of the actua...81%The concept of rationality does not simply consist in one's conception...81%Physical conditions always play some role in plausible psychological g...80%Davidson holds that there are constitutive a priori principles underly...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: anomalous-monism
    View source passageHide passage
    One might understand the reasoning here in the following way: because it is built into our conception of rationality that our own particular grasp of rationality may be mistaken on any given occasion and is also inherently limited, no statement of psychological or psychophysical generalizations could exhaust, and therefore explain, our conception of rationality. If the concept of rationality does not simply consist in one’s conception, at any given time, of rationality, then it cannot be capture

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective