Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    None of the many possible geometries need to refer to Euc... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Geometry is whatever can be described in the Riemannian formalism, not necessarily referring to Euclidean space.

    None of the many possible geometries need to refer to Euclidean space, however intuitive Euclidean space may be.

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Philosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Geometry is whatever can be described in the Riemannian formalism, not necessari...The Riemannian formalism provides a very general framework allowing for a large ...The acceptance of non-Euclidean and Riemannian geometries went beyond presenting...

    Similar

    Scientific knowledge of space is of a different kind from our knowledg...82%No geometry need refer to Euclidean space as a foundation or standard.82%Pythagorean-Riemannian space is one among several possible types of me...82%The representation of space is an intuition, not a concept.81%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: epistemology-geometry
    View source passageHide passage
    The importance of a rigorous account of any part of mathematics should not be ignored, but the acceptance of non-Euclidean and Riemannian geometries went beyond the presentation of a consistent formalism. It marks the acceptance of the abstract view that geometry is whatever can be described in the Riemannian formalism: one has a very general framework, allowing for a dizzying number of concrete specifications. Thus the door was opened to the view that there are many geometries, each of which mu

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective