Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Not all matter is suitable for all changes guided by a form — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Locke's borderline cases argument against substantial forms fails

    Not all matter is suitable for all changes guided by a form

    CausationModality & Possibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityCausation

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Philosophy of Language
    1 linked

    Related

    Locke's borderline cases argument against substantial forms failsThe Aristotelian matter/form distinction allows that the form guides changes in ...When matter is unsuitable to achieve the end of the formal cause, the result can...

    Similar

    In every instance of change, two factors are present: matter and form81%The Aristotelian matter/form distinction allows that the form guides c...79%A necessary condition of there being change is the existence of matter...79%Nothing can have a form unless it also has an underlying matter.77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: real-essence
    View source passageHide passage
    By introducing the distinction between real and nominal essences and thereby dividing their roles, Locke has provided himself with a number of resources to criticize the Scholastic theory of species. There are, however, reasons to worry about the viability of these criticisms. After all, these arguments seem to beg the question against the Aristotelian tradition. The existence of substantial forms need not entail the existence of hard-edged natural kinds, and so Locke's 'moulds and forms' metaph

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective