Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    NP is closed under polynomial-time many-one reducibility — Carmelics
    Home/Truth & Knowledge
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→BHP is in P only if P = NP

    NP is closed under polynomial-time many-one reducibility

    Truth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Truth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 linked claim · 2 topics

    All sources support it1 linkedModality & Possibility1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Truth & Knowledge
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    BHP is in P only if P = NP

    Related

    BHP is NP-completeBHP is in P only if P = NP

    Similar

    NP is closed under polynomial time many-one reducibility, meaning if Y...95%NP is closed under polynomial-time many-one reductions92%NP is closed under polynomial-time reductions85%X is polynomial time many-one reducible to Y via function f(x), meanin...82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: computational-complexity
    View source passageHide passage
    We additionally say that a class \(\textbf{C}\) is closed under \(\leq_P\) if \(Y \in \textbf{C}\) and \(X \leq_P Y\) implies \(X \in \textbf{C}\). [16] A problem \(Y\) is said to be hard for a class \(\textbf{C}\) if \(X \leq_P Y\) for all \(X \in \textbf{C}\). Finally \(Y\) is said to be complete for \(\textbf{C}\) if it is both hard for \(\textbf{C}\) and also a member of \(\textbf{C}\). e. so-called NP-complete problems. A canonical example of such a problem is a time-bounded variant of the

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective