Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Occasionalism (Malebranche) and concurrentism (Aquinas, S... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Theistic intuitions support the claim that God's creative volitions are necessarily a causally sufficient condition (in the weak sense) of the existence of every other concrete object.

    Occasionalism (Malebranche) and concurrentism (Aquinas, Suárez) both deny that divine volition alone is causally sufficient, requiring either creature cooperation or secondary causes.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.If creatures have no causal powers, divine omnipotence becomes compatible with genuine human agency and moral responsibility.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Secondary causes preserve creature dignity by affirming their real participation in cosmic order, not mere divine puppetry.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Denying creature causation avoids the logical problem of how one agent's will can determine another's free choices.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.If divine volition is not causally sufficient, God's omnipotence is limited by dependence on creature cooperation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Secondary causes either reduce to divine action anyway or introduce unexplained entities, violating parsimony.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Both views struggle to explain how finite creature powers interact with infinite divine power without contradiction.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Aquinas
    Thomas Aquinas was a medieval Italian priest and philosopher (1225-1274) who became one of the most influential thinkers in Western history. He attempted to show that Christian faith and human reason are compatible, arguing that we can use logic and observation to understand God and the natural world. His ideas deeply shaped Catholic theology and continue to influence how religious and secular institutions think about ethics, knowledge, and the relationship between science and belief.
    Causally sufficient(describing the relationship between brain states and actions)
    Enough to guarantee something will happen on its own—if A is causally sufficient for B, then A happening automatically means B will happen.
    Creature cooperation(in theological theories about causation)
    The idea that created things (like humans or animals) actively participate or work together with God in making things happen.
    Malebranche
    Nicolas Malebranche was a 17th-century French philosopher who developed the idea that God is the only true cause of everything that happens in the world, and that our minds and bodies don't directly interact but are coordinated by God like two synchronized clocks. He's important because his unusual theory tried to solve the puzzle of how a non-physical mind can affect a physical body, and his ideas influenced later European philosophy. His work represents one of the most creative attempts in Western thought to explain the relationship between mind and matter.
    Suárez(the philosopher being discussed)
    Francisco Suárez was a Spanish philosopher from the 1500s-1600s who wrote extensively about metaphysics (the study of what exists and why). He's one of the most influential philosophers of his time, especially in debates about how things relate to each other.
    concurrentism(medieval debates on divine concurrence with creaturely action)
    A position on God's activity vis-à-vis creaturely activity, intermediate in logical strength between mere conservationism and occasionalism
    divine volition(as used in philosophy of religion and theology)
    God's will or God's choice to make something the way it is.
    occasionalism(Malebranche's metaphysics)
    The doctrine that bodies cannot directly cause modifications in minds (or in each other); instead, a causal relation between body and mind obtains only when God intends the mind to undergo a certain modification on the occasion of a certain bodily change.
    secondary causes(Carroll's neo-Thomistic model of divine and natural causation)
    Natural creaturely causes that operate within the world; in Thomistic metaphysics, these are grounded in and dependent upon the primary cause

    Connections

    2 topics

    Causation1 linkedDivine Attributes1 linked

    Related

    Both views struggle to explain how finite creature powers interact with infinite...Denying creature causation avoids the logical problem of how one agent's will ca...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    If creatures have no causal powers, divine omnipotence becomes compatible with g...
    If divine volition is not causally sufficient, God's omnipotence is limited by d...
    +3 moreShow less
    Secondary causes either reduce to divine action anyway or introduce unexplained ...Secondary causes preserve creature dignity by affirming their real participation...Theistic intuitions support the claim that God's creative volitions are necessar...