Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Occasionalism's attribution of all causal efficacy to God makes God the direct author of evil acts, undermining divine moral perfection.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Causing an act and being morally responsible for it are distinct: God can cause a creature's action while the creature bears moral responsibility.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Evil requires corrupted will or intention; God causing physical motions that constitute evil acts need not involve God's evil intention.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
This objection assumes libertarian agency is necessary for moral responsibility, which occasionalists reject in favor of compatibilist accounts.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
If God directly causes all events including evil acts, God bears full causal responsibility for those acts' moral character.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A morally perfect being cannot be the direct cause of evil acts, as this would constitute performing or willing evil.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Occasionalism commits to God as the sole causal agent, leaving no coherent way to absolve God of authorship of evil.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.