Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Omniscience need only require knowledge of all true propositions, and on B-theory, tensed indexical propositions reduce to tenseless ones.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Indexical content like 'now' may not reduce to tenseless propositions without loss of phenomenological or assertoric meaning.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
B-theory itself is metaphysically controversial; grounding omniscience on it assumes a contested view of time's nature.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Omniscience of tenseless facts alone may not explain how God knows the subjective experience of 'now' that conscious beings have.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
B-theory treats time as a static dimension where all moments exist equally, eliminating metaphysical privilege of the present.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Tensed propositions like 'it is now raining' can be translated to tenseless facts about when rain occurs in spacetime.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
An omniscient being knowing all true propositions (tenseless and tensed-reduced) avoids the problem of knowledge changing over time.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.