On a Strawsonian view, reactive attitudes constitutive of accountability are criterially linked to seeing agents as moral equals, making the fairness conditions Watson cites internal to attributability itself.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

1 reason for

1 reason against

Reasons For

1 perspective

Reason for

1.Strawson's reactive attitudes (resentment, gratitude) presuppose viewing others as responsible agents, not mere objects to be managed.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.Fairness requires equal moral standing: we cannot coherently resent someone while denying them the same accountability we claim for ourselves.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.If fairness conditions are external to attributability, we could coherently attribute responsibility while unfairly denying reciprocal standing.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

Reasons Against

1 perspective

Reason against

1.Reactive attitudes may track causal responsibility independently of fairness; we resent incompetent drivers without commitment to their equality.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.Watson's fairness conditions concern *when it's appropriate to hold someone accountable*, not *what makes attribution criterially true*.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.One can attribute moral agency while reasonably withholding reactive attitudes due to temporary incapacity, without incoherence in the attribution itself.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

Next step

Based on where you are in your exploration

Strongest counterpoint

Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

Key Terms

Accountability(as used in ethics): Being responsible and expected to answer for your actions, including facing consequences if you cause harm.
Attributability(as used in moral responsibility): Whether we can fairly say an action truly belongs to or reflects a person's character, beliefs, or values—not just something that happened to them.
Criterially linked(as used in philosophy): Connected to something as a defining feature or standard; if you see the link present, it serves as proof or evidence of the connection.
Fairness conditions(as used in ethics): Requirements or standards that need to be met for something to be considered fair or just.
Moral equals(as used in ethics): The idea that all people deserve equal moral respect and consideration, regardless of their differences.
Strawsonian view(as used in ethics and responsibility): A philosophical approach based on the ideas of P.F. Strawson, a 20th-century philosopher who argued that our ordinary ways of relating to each other emotionally—like gratitude, resentment, and forgiveness—are the foundation for understanding moral responsibility, rather than starting from abstract rules.
Watson(as referenced in philosophy of action and ethics): Refers to Gary Watson, a contemporary philosopher who wrote influential work on responsibility, moral responsibility, and how we distinguish between different aspects of human agency.
constitutive(an alternative type of relationship the grounding relation might be): Describes how something is made up of or formed from basic components that define its essential nature.
reactive attitudes(Blame is given as the paradigm case of a reactive attitude): Attitudes that agents have towards other agents in response to those agents' behavior

Connections

1 topic

Moral Responsibility1 linked

Conditions may apply to accountability that do not apply to attributability.Fairness requires equal moral standing: we cannot coherently resent someone whil...If fairness conditions are external to attributability, we could coherently attr...One can attribute moral agency while reasonably withholding reactive attitudes d...

Details

Type: claim
Perspectives: 2 (1 for, 1 against)
Edits: 1 edit