Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that On Campbell's trope theory, spacetime points are logical constructs from bundles of co-present tropes, not containers that tropes are literally 'parts of'.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Logical constructs lack causal powers, yet spacetime appears to causally constrain which tropes can co-locate.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If spacetime points are merely constructed, we lose explanatory resources for why physical laws exhibit the symmetries they do.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Tropes are the fundamental particulars; spacetime points have no independent existence apart from the properties located there.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
This avoids the problem of explaining how abstract containers can literally contain concrete particular qualities.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Co-location of tropes is a primitive relation that grounds spacetime structure without positing substantival space.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.