Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    On Hasker's theory, the soul (a.k.a. the divine nature) i... — Carmelics
    Home/Trinity
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Hasker's theory is problematic because the divine nature/soul, which is not God, would be the ultimate reality rather than God.

    On Hasker's theory, the soul (a.k.a. the divine nature) is the source of the Persons and so of God (the Trinity).

    Trinity
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Trinity

    Related

    "God is the ultimate reality" seems to be true by definition.Hasker's theory is problematic because the divine nature/soul, which is not God,...If the divine nature/soul is the source of God but is not itself God, then somet...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Trinity
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    If the divine nature/soul is the source of God but is not itself God, ...86%Hasker's theory is problematic because the divine nature/soul, which i...85%In various places Hasker says the Persons are constituted by the divin...81%Swinburne's theory carries the serious price of allowing that a divine...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: trinity
    View source passageHide passage
    Leftow also objects that the sentence “God is the ultimate reality” seems to be true by definition. But on Hasker’s theory, this soul (a.k.a. the divine nature), which is not God, would be the ultimate reality, being the source of the Persons and so of God (the Trinity) (12). Again, Leftow objects that this theory is not monotheistic; rather, the theory features three deities which we can’t describe as such because there is one object (the divine nature/soul) which constitutes them (15).

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective