Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    On the Aristotelian account, a demonstration must proceed... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→A demonstrative argument is one in which certainty is transferred from premises to conclusion.

    On the Aristotelian account, a demonstration must proceed from causes, so certainty of premises is insufficient if the inferential link fails to capture the genuine explanatory ground of the conclusion.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.True knowledge requires understanding why something is the case, not merely that it is the case, which demands causal explanations.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A logically valid argument from false premises can yield true conclusions but fails to explain why those conclusions hold.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Scientific understanding differs fundamentally from lucky guessing; only causal connections capture this explanatory distinction.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Some truths (e.g., mathematical theorems) are necessarily true yet cannot be grounded in efficient causes in Aristotle's sense.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The requirement for causal grounding makes demonstration impossible in abstract domains, limiting knowledge to the merely sensible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Certainty from valid deduction already provides epistemic security; adding causal requirements introduces unverifiable metaphysical demands.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Aristotelian
    "Aristotelian" refers to ideas and methods based on the teachings of Aristotle, an ancient Greek philosopher who lived over 2,000 years ago. He emphasized observing the real world, using common sense reasoning, and organizing knowledge into logical categories—rather than relying solely on abstract ideas. His approach heavily influenced Western thought, science, and education for centuries, making him one of the most important thinkers in history.
    Causes(Newtonian mechanics; causes as they relate to true motion)
    The forces impressed upon bodies
    Inferential link(logic and epistemology)
    A logical connection between two ideas where one idea supports or leads to another idea.
    demonstration(The target of the skeptical critique; assumed to be the standard model of knowledge acquisition)
    A method of inferential proof from first principles or definitions, claimed to be the means by which knowledge is acquired
    explanatory ground(in epistemology and philosophy of science)
    The real, underlying reason why something is true—the actual explanation, not just a logical chain that happens to lead to the right answer.
    premises(as used in logic and philosophical arguments)
    Starting statements or assumptions that are used to support a conclusion—like the opening claims in an argument that lead to a final point.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    A demonstrative argument is one in which certainty is transferred from premises ...A logically valid argument from false premises can yield true conclusions but fa...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    Certainty from valid deduction already provides epistemic security; adding causa...
    Scientific understanding differs fundamentally from lucky guessing; only causal ...
    +3 moreShow less
    Some truths (e.g., mathematical theorems) are necessarily true yet cannot be gro...The requirement for causal grounding makes demonstration impossible in abstract ...True knowledge requires understanding why something is the case, not merely that...