Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    On the bulwark view, any exception for benign interventio... — Carmelics
    Home/Bioethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The view that informed consent is necessary solely as a preventative bulwark against coercive or fraudulent practices is called into question.

    On the bulwark view, any exception for benign interventions would be impossible because benign interventions would be just as coercive or fraudulent as invasive ones.

    BioethicsRights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    BioethicsRights & Liberty

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consequentialism2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Bioethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A theory that entails no exceptions for benign interventions conflicts with this...It is sometimes correct for benign studies not to require full informed consent.The view that informed consent is necessary solely as a preventative bulwark aga...

    Similar

    A theory that entails no exceptions for benign interventions conflicts...77%Yet full informed consent may not be required for benign interventions...73%Intervening against a diagnosable risk qualifies as treatment even if ...70%HP2 permits intervention whenever harm to others can be prevented, reg...68%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: informed-consent
    View source passageHide passage
    Still, some elements of the requirement of informed consent must remain in place, even in standard blood draws and other benign interventions (Dickert et al. forthcoming). Physical duress against a refusing patient and the intentional exploitation of a patient’s ignorance about blood draws both usually remain wrong. This may suggest that informed consent bundles together several requirements with different levels of stringency. Some are necessary in more contexts than others. It may also be thou

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective