Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that One is not required to obey a state solely because the state has issued a command.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
A legitimate state authority generates content-independent reasons for obedience, as Raz argues in 'The Morality of Freedom' (1986).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If citizens only obey commands they independently judge just, coordinated governance and the rule of law become structurally impossible.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The service conception of authority holds that states better enable subjects to conform to right reason than individual judgment alone.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Associative obligations, as defended by Dworkin, arise from membership in a political community and are not reducible to the justice of particular commands.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Requiring independent evaluation of each command's justice privileges those with epistemic resources, systematically disadvantaging the marginalized.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Obedience is not owed to the state on the basis of the state's authority alone.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The justness of the commanded action, not the source of the command, grounds the obligation to obey.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.